This certainly applies to modern Britain. But reclaiming Britishness is not a purely cultural endeavour, it is a move away from political passivity in the face of an ever more diverse and deeply inadequate and unpopular government. It is necessary to reform the system in this country, where the situation is not noticeable.
Furthermore, readers may wonder to what extent a modified version of Englishness can cross class boundaries. The word „progressive“ is used too freely. another england As if it's uncontroversial and perhaps unproblematic. And neoliberal conservative values can now be seen to be firmly entrenched in the leadership of England's two largest political parties.
Centralization
It could therefore be argued that neither of the two main parties is actually part of a 'progressive' England that is being built, but merely the vestiges of past failures. I don't think either party can expect to play a role in reshaping Britishness to incorporate the diversity that England's communities share.
As Mr. Lucas argues, Britain needs a written constitution to curb excessive centralization. Courts are forced to protect human rights from government depredations. Proportional representation has the potential to transform politics at all levels, including the elected House of Lords. Land value taxes could replace council and business tax rates to attack concentration of wealth.
But is the British Parliament, which is under the British Parliament, appropriate for the democratization of Britain? Regional differences in identity existed, and regional institutions began providing services from the time the UK joined the EU. The British Parliament may be popular, but both Labor and the Conservative Party have a long track record of ignoring public opinion on many issues.
evacuated
Having both a UK Parliament and a British parliament sounds very heavy before the details are agreed.Maybe the author should have thought about it localization Written by Colin Hines collapse of the nation Written by Leopold Cole?
Without going into the thesis of these works, I can agree with Caroline that London rules England. This is done through concentrated employment, resources and authority, and in such a way that nearby settlements are often commuter communities serving the UK capital.
Caroline knows this all too well. But giving them the power to significantly change the political experience of people across England would mean significantly less power and resources based in London. Wherever a British Parliament is established, it could become a weak echo of the centralization that is already destroying our political culture.
alienated
I love the idea of a culture where the positive examples of the Kinks, the Beatles, and those working for this country in the vast „third sector“ of public service and large and small interest groups and campaigns are recreated. By enabling center institutions.
Playing our part to restore nature and maintain a livable climate is a reborn Britishness that is hugely popular, like the public reception of the Lionesses who won the 2022 UEFA Championship. may become part of.
However, the unmentioned issue regarding rejoining the EU is that Another UK Unresolved aspects of British nationalism. Currently, public opinion polls show that public support for rejoining the country is over 60%.
Caroline clearly recognizes that „Anglocentric British nationalism“ requires a „political response“. But this requires multiple responses, and I believe that rejoining the EU is a key part of defeating the far-right nationalists who have been gaining strength on the Conservative fringe since 2010. I believe.
So whatever unity can be achieved across political frameworks to re-empower England, its regions and regions, right-wing values and Brexit will be defeated, discredited and marginalized. needs to be shown. Maybe there will be something in Caroline's next book.
this author
Steve Dawe is a former interdisciplinary social science lecturer. he, west of england byline And elsewhere too, It focuses on the climate and ecological emergency.