Just a few days ago, OpenAI's Usage policy page The company specifically states that its technology may not be used for „military and war“ purposes. That line has since been removed.The first thing I noticed was interceptcompany The page has been updated on January 10th „to provide greater clarity and more service-specific guidance,“ as stated in the changelog. The company still prohibits the use of large-scale language models (LLMs) for anything that could cause harm, and warns against using its services for „the development or use of weapons.“ However, the company removed the wording regarding „military and war.“
Although its actual impact remains to be seen, this change in language comes at a time when military agencies around the world are showing interest in using AI. „Given the use of AI systems to target civilians in the Gaza Strip, we have made the decision to remove the term 'military and war' from OpenAI's authorization policy,“ said Sarah Myers West, managing director at AI Now. „It's a remarkable moment to take down.“ the institute told the publication.
The use of „military and war“ on the prohibited list indicates that OpenAI cannot work with government agencies like the Department of Defense, which often offer lucrative deals to contractors. At this time, the company does not have any products that could directly kill or cause bodily harm to anyone.However, as intercept He said the technology could be used for tasks like writing code and processing procurement orders for things that could be used to kill people.
When asked about the policy wording changes, OpenAI spokesperson Nico Felix told the publication that the company is „easy to remember, especially since our tools are used by everyday users all over the world. We aimed to create a set of universal principles that would be easy to apply.“ You can now also build GPT. „Principles like 'Do not harm others' are broad but easily grasped and relevant to a variety of situations,“ Felix said, adding that OpenAI provides „a clear example of the use of weapons and It specifically cites the dangers of But the spokesperson reportedly did not say whether the ban on using its technology to „cause harm“ to others would include any kind of military use other than weapons development.