In November, a group of nonfiction writers filed a lawsuit. Blame OpenAI and Microsoft used the intellectual property of others without permission to train the former’s generative AI technology. Nowadays, the number of non-fiction writers is increasing. sue a company For using their work to train OpenAI’s GPT Large-Scale Language Model (LLM). Journalists Nicholas A. Basbens and Nicholas Gage accuse authors like the defendants of „massive and intentional plagiarism of copyrighted works“ in a proposed class action lawsuit. ing.
Professional writers „have limited resources to fund their research“ and „typically self-fund their projects,“ they said in the complaint. Meanwhile, the defendants had „ready access to billions of dollars in capital“ and „simply stole“ the plaintiffs‘ „works to build a new billion-plus dollar commercial industry.“ There is. The suit says the use of copyrighted works is a „deliberate strategy“ by the companies, and that not paying authors gives the defendants „an even higher profit margin.“ The plaintiffs added that the companies could have explored alternative financing options, such as profit sharing, but instead „decided to steal.“
Mr. Basbens and Mr. Gage are seeking to represent „a class of writers whose copyrighted works have been systematically plagiarized“ by the defendants. They are seeking damages of up to $150,000 for each infringed work and a permanent injunction „to prevent such harm from occurring again.“ Mr. Basbanes is a „recognized authority on book history and book culture.“ According to Gage, CNBCpreviously worked times and wall street journal.
OpenAI has accused creators of using their work without permission to train its LLMs, including by fiction authors George R.R. Martin, John Grisham, and Jodi Pickult. It is fighting a growing list of lawsuits it has filed. Late December 2023, new york times sued The company and its biggest backer, Microsoft, were critical of the newspaper’s use of the article for AI training. An OpenAI representative said at the time that the parties were having „productive conversations“ and that the lawsuit was unexpected.
This article contains affiliate links. If you click on such links and make a purchase, we may earn a commission.