Last month, Epic Games filed a motion asking a California judge to hold Apple in contempt for violating a 2021 injunction related to the company's App Store practices. Apple is now asking a judge to dismiss Epic's claims. It claimed the motion was an attempt to „micromanage Apple's business operations in a way that increases Epic's profitability.“
The original injunction, by U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, requires Apple to allow developers to offer external payment option options in the App Store and in-app purchases. You can avoid fees of up to 30%.apple In January, developers were allowed to link to external websites to purchase replacement products, but the new rules also require them to get approval from Apple to do so. It also requires charging fees of 12 to 27 percent on transactions.around ReutersEpic argued that this would render alternative payment options „commercially unusable.“
Epic also said at the time that Apple's „so-called compliance is a sham“ and accused the company's recent moves of violating the injunction. Apple claims to have acted pursuant to the injunction, stating in a new filing: „The purpose of the injunction is to make information about alternative purchasing options more readily available and does not prescribe the commercial terms under which Apple will provide access to its platform.“, Tools & Technology, Users base. ”